Women-without-underwear

# 5 # 2 # 1

PLURAL FEMALE # 2
My thoughts today are centered on a theory developed some time ago by a person who is very close to me and tries to explain, so definitely not scientific, but very realistic since it is based on direct experience, the nature of male / female relationships.
The theory is that the two lobes where the brain is divided, that of that of boys and girls, whose activity regulates the life of our thoughts and our actions.
As we all know, therefore, the human brain has two lobes, the right and left. Obviously I can not quibble in a clinical / medical how they work, I will describe the theory above which reads as follows: the brain of an average male, divided into two lobes, PROVIDES THAT ONE OF THE TWO IS TOO underdevelopment, AT CAPACITY, WHILE THE OTHER IS AMAZINGLY OVERSIZED. In the first lobe data will be processed WOMEN WEDDING, the second those relating to women by thrombi. You will, I hope, be omitted on the color of my terminology definitions, which, however, make the basic idea in a manner that prevents to use words more politically correct.
, yes, the first lobe is so small because it will contain very little data. The woman to marry, in fact, by tradition and culture is one and only and therefore do not need much space to hold the information; vice versa, and this comes to my aid the dramatic statistics for which the ratio of men and women is of one to seven, the second lobe will contain a myriad of information.
All this may not raise many doubts about if it were not for the fact that the two lobes are not communicating. They, in fact, orbit each other in absolute independence, without that there is the possibility of an exchange of information.
And here's the point in my thinking: IF A WOMAN IS CLOSED IN WOMEN IN LOBO-DA-TRUMPET Will NEVER, EVER GO TO THE FIRST AND MOST coveted category. And of course I will not dwell on why every woman want to be that a married woman, or simply one who can keep a history of normal sunlight, I think, in fact, have given sufficient explanation in my riflessine PLURAL FEMALE # 1.
This theory, these are the results: AS A WOMAN IS EXCEPTIONAL, BEAUTIFUL, SEDUCTIVE, SMART, SEXUALLY rewarding, ETC ... ETC ..., if the boy whose turn it is stored in the second lobe, may make somersaults, inventing strategies, groped also fit the person in their rhythms and needs of partners, but will never change his mind. They will always and forever a story without FUTURE.
Yet we girls are not so drastic in our positions. We do not.
usual fact we also think and believe against all evidence, that this relationship can be transformed, which can survive even beyond the four walls within which we consume the embraces. We are willing to grant the boy in question an opportunity to go to dinner together, maybe to the cinema or just a walk outdoors. Submit to our friends, put them in our private social fabric.
ALWAYS THE USUAL ROMANTIC?? Illus ALWAYS THE USUAL?
Or maybe, just imprudence?